The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently approved two key Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) proposals – the Remote Inspection Pilot Program and the Residential Supervisory Location. These adoptions signal an acceptance for hybrid workforce models. This blog post delves deeper into the nuances and implications of these decisions.
Remote Inspection Pilot Program: A Leap into Digital Supervision
In April 2023, FINRA unveiled a proposal that would reshape a crucial element of how firms manage compliance: the Remote Inspections Pilot Program. This initiative, recently greenlit by the SEC, marks a pivotal shift in the way member firms can handle their branch office inspection requirements.
The program is a voluntary, three-year Remote Inspections Pilot that allows eligible firms to elect to fulfill the branch office inspection requirements of FINRA Rule 3110 by conducting inspections of eligible branch offices, Offices of Supervisory Jurisdiction (OSJ) and non-branch locations remotely without an on-site visit under certain conditions. This move is not merely a logistical change; it represents a reimagining of regulatory operations in an increasingly digital world.
Participating firms are required to comply with a stringent set of criteria to be eligible for this program. These criteria include:
Effective Supervisory Systems: Firms must demonstrate that their supervisory systems are capable of operating effectively in a remote environment. This involves ensuring that remote inspections are as thorough and comprehensive as their in-person counterparts.
Robust Documentation and Data Collection: Pilot participating firms will be required to collect and provide to FINRA on a quarterly basis data and information obtained through remote inspections and supervisory activities.
Stringent Eligibility Criteria: Not all firms will qualify for the pilot program. FINRA has laid out specific conditions that firms must meet to participate, ensuring that only those with the requisite infrastructure and compliance culture are included.
The program demands a proactive stance from firms. They must not only adapt their operations to accommodate remote inspections but also ensure that these methods are as robust and effective as traditional on-site inspections. This requires a risk-based approach, where firms assess and mitigate potential challenges and vulnerabilities associated with remote supervision.
Location-Specific Risk Assessment: Prior to electing to inspect a location remotely, firms will need to conduct a location-specific risk assessment that document factors the firm considered when determining the location could be inspected remotely. For example, the volume and nature of customer complaints, outside business activities, the customer base, whether associates at the location are on heightened supervision plans, among others.
Continuous Adaptation and Improvement: As the program progresses, firms will need to continuously refine their remote supervision techniques, incorporating feedback and lessons learned to enhance the effectiveness of their remote inspections.
The approval of the Pilot is a forward-looking move, acknowledging the dynamic nature of the financial services industry and the evolving role of technology in regulatory compliance and supervision. For member firms, this presents both a challenge and an opportunity: to reimagine their supervisory practices in a digital age while maintaining the rigorous standards expected by regulatory authorities. As the program unfolds, it will be a testing ground for new practices and protocols that could potentially set the standard for future regulatory frameworks in the digital era.
Residential Supervisory Location Proposal: Adapting to Modern Work Trends
Alongside the Remote Inspection Pilot Program, the SEC has approved a proposal that aligns regulatory practices with evolving workplace models – treating private residences where supervisory activities are conducted as non-branch locations.
The rise of remote and hybrid work models, accelerated by recent global events, has transformed the traditional concept of the workplace. Recognizing this shift, FINRA’s proposal adapts regulatory practices to these new realities. By categorizing private residences where supervisory activities are taking place as non-branch locations, the frequency of required inspections is reduced from an annual requirement to a regular periodic schedule presumed to be at least every 3 years. This adjustment reflects a practical response to the growing trend of remote supervision and acknowledges the changing nature of work environments.
The approval does not imply a relaxation of regulatory standards. Instead, it signifies a recalibration of supervisory practices to ensure they remain relevant and effective in today’s work landscape. To qualify a private residence as a Residential Supervisory Location (RSL), member firms must adhere to a stringent set of conditions:
Limited Business Activities: The proposal stipulates that business activities at an RSL must be limited to either a single associated person or immediate family members residing at that location. This ensures a controlled environment, minimizing the risk of regulatory breaches.
Person-Specific Risk Assessments: Firms are required to conduct thorough risk assessments for each associated person operating from an RSL. This involves evaluating the potential risks associated with remote supervisory activities and implementing measures to mitigate these risks.
Documentation and Compliance: Firms must maintain detailed records of their compliance efforts, documenting how they are managing and supervising activities at these RSLs.
While adapting to the changing work landscape, the proposal maintains a high level of regulatory oversight. The transition to RSLs demands that firms:
Develop Robust Remote Supervision Strategies: Firms must create and implement effective strategies for remotely supervising activities conducted at RSLs. This includes leveraging technology to monitor compliance and maintain communication with remote supervisors.
Continuous Monitoring and Adaptation: Firms need to continuously monitor the effectiveness of their remote supervision practices, making necessary adjustments to address any emerging risks or challenges.
Training and Support: Firms should provide adequate training and support to their staff operating from RSLs and those who supervise these individuals, ensuring they understand and adhere to all regulatory requirements.
The SEC’s approval of treating private residences as non-branch locations for supervisory activities is a progressive step towards embracing the realities of modern work practices. It demonstrates FINRA’s commitment to adapting regulatory frameworks in a way that respects the evolving nature of work while steadfastly maintaining regulatory rigor. For member firms, this decision presents an opportunity to rethink their supervisory strategies in line with contemporary work trends, ensuring that regulatory compliance remains robust in a changing world. As the financial industry continues to evolve, this balance between adaptation and oversight will be crucial in shaping a resilient and responsive regulatory environment.
Future Outlook and Preparations
Due to uncertainty as to whether the SEC would approve or disapprove the Remote Inspections Pilot by year-end, FINRA proposed in September to extend FINRA Rule 3110.17 (temporary relief allowing for remote inspections for 2020, 2021, 2022 and 2023) to include calendar year 2024’s inspection obligations through the earlier of the effective date of the Pilot or June 30th 2024. FINRA has not yet announced the effective date of the pilot, but once the Pilot commences, Rule 3110.17 is expected to automatically sunset. When that happens, firms will either need to participate in the Pilot or revert back to full compliance with the inspection obligations of FINRA Rule 3110(c).
These changes offer a forward-thinking approach to regulatory compliance, acknowledging and adapting to the increasing digitalization and remote nature of the workplace. Firms should begin considering potential impacts to their operations, policies & procedures, supervisory controls, system resource needs and training plans as they await further guidance from FINRA.
Conclusion: Balancing Innovation and Regulation
The SEC’s approval of these proposals signals a significant shift towards a more flexible, digitally-oriented regulatory environment. By adapting to modern work trends, FINRA demonstrates its commitment to innovation, while ensuring that investor protection and regulatory oversight remain paramount. These changes represent an opportunity for member firms to modernize their operations while upholding high standards of compliance and supervision. As we move towards these implementation dates, it’s crucial for firms to understand the full scope of these changes and strategically prepare to leverage these new regulatory frameworks effectively.
How RegEd Can Help
RegEd’s industry leading Audit Management solution enables audit teams to preempt incidents of risk across operational, regulatory, and reputational risks, while streamlining the branch audit process. The solution enables firms to fully plan, schedule, conduct, resolve and report on branch audits. Firms can take advantage of the solution’s scheduling feature, which makes sure audits get scheduled in a timely manner to comply with annual requirements in states that have them.
Proven over scores of implementations, Audit Management eliminates manual processes, creating a seamless, efficient, end to end process for branch audit reviews while enabling firms to employ a risk-based approach to effectively identify and remediate areas of potential risk before they result in non-compliance consequences.
Schedule a consultation with one of our solution experts to learn more about how RegEd’s audit solution can assist your firm.