Securities Regulatory Roundup | September-October 2026

September and October brought several developments with direct implications for securities compliance programs: a new outside-activities framework, changes to performance-projection communications, updated examination priorities, and new implementation dates for qualification exams and investment adviser continuing education. A significant banking enforcement action offered a reminder that identifying a compliance weakness is not the same as resolving it.

For broker-dealers and investment advisers, the throughline is operational: each development needs to be connected to the policies, supervisory processes, training, systems, and records it affects. The highlights below distinguish new requirements from staff guidance and future implementation work.

SEC · Examination Readiness

SEC Releases Its Fiscal Year 2027 Examination Priorities

The SEC released its Fiscal Year 2027 examination priorities on October 23. Areas of focus include investment advisers’ fiduciary obligations, conflicts of interest, recommendations, and compliance programs; retail investor protection; private funds and private credit; and broker-dealer financial responsibility, trading, supervision, and anti-money laundering compliance.

Cross-cutting priorities include cybersecurity, operational resiliency, protection of customer information, emerging technology, and evolving market infrastructure. The priorities describe the staff’s risk-based examination focus; they do not create new legal obligations.

Firms should

  • Use the report to organize a focused review of applicable risks, rather than treating every topic as equally relevant.
  • Map priority areas to existing controls, recent findings, testing plans, and accountable owners, then retain evidence of the decisions and follow-up.
SEC · Annual Compliance Reviews

Annual Reviews Need to Evaluate How Compliance Works in Practice

The SEC’s September 14 Risk Alert addresses investment adviser annual compliance reviews under Rule 206(4)-7. It emphasizes evaluating both the adequacy of written policies and the effectiveness of their implementation, taking account of compliance matters, business changes, and regulatory developments.

The alert is staff guidance, not a new rule. Its practical value is as a benchmark for assessing whether the review process produces a meaningful evaluation of the adviser’s actual risks and practices.

Firms should

  • Document review scope, testing, findings, and follow-up.
  • Assign responsibility for corrective action and consider how to validate remediation. Annual training and employee attestations can support a compliance program, but should not be treated as substitutes for the required annual review.
FINRA · Outside Activities

Rule 3290 Creates a New Outside-Activities Implementation Project

FINRA Regulatory Notice 26-20, published October 26, announces new Rule 3290, which replaces existing Rules 3270 and 3280. The rule consolidates requirements governing registered persons’ outside activities and associated persons’ outside securities transactions, with an effective date of October 25, 2027.

The transition should be evaluated against the final rule text, not simply treated as a change in rule numbering. Firms will need to determine how the new framework affects the activities they collect, classify, review, and supervise.

Key dates

Rule 3290 effective: October 25, 2027

Firms should

  • Compare existing disclosure forms, activity categories, review criteria, approval conditions, and supervisory procedures with the new rule.
  • Plan for changes to questionnaires, routing, employee guidance, and records, while maintaining existing requirements until the transition takes effect.
  • Ensure you continue to meet the Form U4 Other Business filing obligations that are not changed by the adoption of FINRA Rule 3290.
FINRA · Communications with the Public

Performance-Projection Approval Calls for Careful Advertising Controls

The SEC approved amendments to FINRA Rule 2210 on October 15 to permit performance projections and targeted returns in communications, subject to specified conditions. FINRA’s October 21 update states that an effective date will be announced in a subsequent Regulatory Notice.

Approval should not be read as immediate, unrestricted permission to use projections. Firms should assess the approved text and implementation notice before changing their communications practices. Dual-registered firms should separately consider the requirements applicable to investment adviser marketing.

Firms should

  • Inventory communications that could use projections and assess audience eligibility, disclosures, review standards, supporting records, and supervisory approvals.
  • Update advertising review workflows and training before implementation, rather than relying on a general disclosure to address every risk.
Federal · Technology Terminology

Federal AI Terminology Changes, but Governance Remains the Work

Executive Order 14434, signed September 29 and published October 2, directs executive agencies, to the extent permitted by law, to use “Super Intelligence” or “SI” in place of “Artificial Intelligence” or “AI” in non-statutory communications and documents. The order does not require alteration of previously issued regulations, contracts, or historical documents.

For compliance teams, this is a terminology development to account for when monitoring federal materials, not evidence that a new technology category has replaced existing governance obligations.

Firms should

  • Include both AI and SI terminology in regulatory monitoring.
  • Continue assessing the underlying use case, data, vendor, human oversight, and control risks rather than relying on the label used in a particular release.
Treasury · AML and Sanctions Enforcement

Treasury Action Highlights the Cost of Unresolved Control Gaps

On October 13, Treasury announced coordinated actions involving a prominent bank. FinCEN assessed a $1.2 billion penalty, and the OCC assessed a $750 million penalty. Importantly, the FinCEN order credits the OCC payment against its assessment, leaving $450 million payable under the FinCEN resolution; the two assessments should not be added together as separate cumulative payments. OFAC also announced an $11.6 million sanctions settlement.

According to Treasury, the bank failed to timely report more than $5 billion in suspicious transactions, including more than $1 billion involving national-security and other priority illicit-finance risks. Findings included ineffective monitoring, due diligence and escalation weaknesses, inadequate expertise and training, and failure to address known deficiencies despite an earlier OCC order.

The action concerns a bank, not a broker-dealer or investment adviser. Its broader compliance lesson is nevertheless relevant: controls must identify, escalate, investigate, and resolve risks in practice, and testing findings must lead to timely corrective action.

Firms should

  • Use the matter as scenario-based material for AML training and remediation governance.
  • Review alert aging, investigation capacity, escalation ownership, monitoring coverage, independent testing, and evidence that corrective actions work.
  • Apply lessons within the requirements specific to the firm’s business and registration.
FINRA + NFA + MSRB + NASAA · Qualification Exams

Exam Retake Changes Have Different Dates and Waiting Periods

FINRA Regulatory Notice 26-18 reduces the waiting periods for its qualification exams to 15 calendar days after the first and second failed attempts, and 60 calendar days after the third and subsequent failures within a two-year period, effective January 19, 2027. The NFA and the MSRB are making corresponding changes.

Unlike FINRA, NFA and MSRB, NASAA has determined to retain the 30 day waiting period after the first and second Series 63, 65, and 66 examination failures. However, they do plan to modify the waiting period after the third and subsequent failures to 60 days beginning January 4, 2027.

Key dates

NASAA changes: January 4, 2027

FINRA, NFA, MSRB changes: January 19, 2027

Firms should

  • The new FINRA waiting periods will automatically apply to new enrollments and any open enrollments without an appointment. Candidates who have a scheduled exam retake appointment after January 19, 2027, should review whether cancelling and rescheduling for an earlier date is beneficial as rescheduling fees may apply.
State Securities · IAR Continuing Education

Washington and Indiana Add to 2027 CE Planning

Washington has joined the state of Indiana in adopting an investment adviser representative continuing education requirement that is consistent with the NASAA model. Both states will implement the requirement January 1, 2027.

Firms should

  • If you have any IARs who are already subject to IAR CE due to registrations in other adopting states and they’re currently CE Inactive, they risk nonrenewal if they do not catch up on IAR CE before the year-end CRD renewal shutdown begins. An IAR that is CE Inactive will hold that status in all states that have adopted the requirement.
  • Review the status of your IARs in an effort to avoid failures to renew.
FINRA · Registration Renewals

The 2027 Renewal Notice Adds Immediate Year-End Tasks

FINRA published Regulatory Notice 26-22 on October 29. Preliminary renewal statements are available November 9, with full payment due December 7; FINRA recommends payment by December 2 to allow processing time. The year-end electronic filing deadline is December 27; final statements become available January 2, with final payment and discrepancy reports due January 22. The CRD will shut down at 6:00 p.m. on December 27, but for IAR CE rostering purposes, the shut down begins at 4:00 p.m.

The notice also directs firms to save renewal reports because the preliminary reports will be replaced and cannot be recreated. Firms should verify that termination filings and payments are reflected correctly rather than relying only on submission confirmations.

Key dates

Preliminary payment due: December 7, 2026

Final payment and discrepancy deadline: January 22, 2027

Firms should

  • Coordinate registration, finance, IAR CE and supervisory teams around payment, reconciliation, and filing deadlines.
  • Review unnecessary registrations before renewal charges are finalized, and preserve reports and evidence of completion.

How RegEd Can Help

Connect regulatory change to supervisory action

September and October activity shows how quickly regulatory developments translate into operational demands. Fraud proposals may require new escalation and documentation workflows. Cybersecurity guidance must be reflected in controls and training. AML enforcement continues to test whether written programs produce timely detection, investigation, and reporting. And future reporting and market-structure changes require coordinated planning well before their compliance dates.

RegEd helps firms connect regulatory intelligence with policies, procedures, training, supervisory workflows, and documentation. Solutions spanning Regulatory Change Management, compliance case management, Firm Element training, branch audit management, and licensing and registration can help firms assign responsibility, manage implementation, and maintain evidence across the compliance lifecycle.

Scroll to top